“You can love completely without complete understanding.”
So I’ve been thinking a lot about the quote we discussed in class today. Thinking about the way it relates to my own life, I’m starting to notice which people in my life this holds true for. My mom, my dad, sister, brother, cousins, etc. Then I started to notice that these people all had something in common. The only people I think that this applies to is my family. I’m not sure why. However, I do know that it didn’t always used to be like that.
There used to be a time where I would always forgive friends and others for what they did. Although some may call it letting people “walk all over me” I thought of it as just being a caring person. No matter what anyone did, I would forgive them, as I knew that if I ever made a mistake, I would want others to forgive me in the same way as well. I thought it was a good way to lead life.
It wasn’t until later in life that I discovered that the person getting hurt in the long run with this kind of thinking, is me. Yes, I thought that forgiving people was just a part of life. However, what about a second time? A third time? A sixth? It seemed as though the same people were hurting me over and over and I couldn’t take it anymore. I cut out all the people that just didn’t make me feel good about myself. I thought that maybe I was acting a little harsh, but I needed to do what was best for me.
So, why doesn’t this thinking apply to family for me? The answer: I’m not sure. I feel like maybe its because I’ve always been taught that I HAVE to love family, no matter what. This sense of obligation was always there. Somehow I just feel like I get to chose my friends, but family is what I was stuck with, and will always be stuck with. My parents would frequently tell my brother, sister, and me that we must always stick together, no matter what happens.
In A River Runs Through It, Norman loves his brother unconditionally. It’s something that I admire and that is an important part of the novel. Paul repeatedly got himself into trouble with gambling, however Norman just kept on loving him and kept trying to help him. He didn’t understand why Paul was doing what he did, but he accepted it. Because of this, I just can’t help but think how the movie would have been like if Norman and Paul were just friends. Although it may have still had the same effect for people, I don’t think it would have for me. Maybe I would have taken pity on Norman because of his attachment to Paul.
People have different opinions on who's worthy of their love and who isn’t. I think I’m happy with my decisions. Who knows if that may change in the future.